PASS
The target is met.
Accept the slice and decide what to harden or expand.
Give your people more time for customers, decisions, and work that needs their judgment. We build and test one AI workflow, then measure whether it helps.
Agree on a measurable problem, build one production slice, and decide whether the evidence supports going further.
WEEK 1
Choose one workflow and owner. Use representative client data to agree on the baseline, target, permissions, and acceptance criteria.
You getA one-page Success Contract and an initial evaluation set.
WEEK 2
Connect input, processing, decision, and output. Use the smallest architecture that can prove the workflow.
You getOne end-to-end system with clear human approval points.
WEEK 3
Run historical and current examples. Check accuracy, exceptions, cost, processing time, and human review time. Test failure and escalation paths.
You getMeasured results, repeatable evaluations, and a record of what fails.
WEEK 4
With client approval, run against incoming work with access controls, logs, cost monitoring, and human escalation. Compare the result with the baseline.
You getA pass, learn, or stop decision based on the evidence, plus a documented handoff.
We agree on the start date once the workflow, owner, representative data, and access are ready. The four-week scope and any dependencies are documented before work starts. A missed target can lead to a stop decision; results are not guaranteed.
No meaningful build begins until the Success Contract defines:
Example: reduce invoice handling from 18 minutes to below 8 while maintaining an agreed accuracy rate. This is an illustrative target, not a client result.
Download the Success Contract templatePASS
Accept the slice and decide what to harden or expand.
LEARN
Explain the gap and decide whether another scoped iteration is worthwhile.
STOP
Document what we learned and stop the investment.
For businesses with established processes and limited internal AI expertise.
If there is no owner, usable data, or way to measure success, we resolve that before building. An uncontrolled high-risk decision is not a first workflow.
Illustrative starting points. We qualify each workflow and agree on access, review, and scope before building.
Give sales a clear next step for each inquiry. Prepare lead briefs, proposals, and follow-up drafts for review.
Put attention on invoices that need a decision. Match records and prepare collections follow-ups for review.
Keep work moving when documents arrive. Extract details, check them, and route exceptions to the right person.
Help people find the answer they need. Search approved company information and show the supporting sources.
Start the day knowing what needs your attention. Prepare priority briefs from approved email, calendars, and reports.
Focus your team on issues that need their judgment. Triage support requests and gather evidence for troubleshooting.
Explore interactive workflows and familiar tools
Give each agent one clear job. An invoice matching agent and an invoice exception agent have different responsibilities, tools, and checks.
Role → Input → Knowledge → Tools → Authority → Output → Evaluation → Escalation
When independent review adds value, give reviewers different jobs: challenge assumptions, check sources, or flag risk. Keep final approval with the named human owner. Agreement between agents does not prove correctness.
Keep running and improving the system with your own team or a provider you choose.
Where practical, we build in your cloud account, Git repository, identity system, and vendor accounts.
You own the project source code, prompts, agent instructions, evaluations, infrastructure definitions, architecture, and documentation. Your data stays yours. Third-party software and services retain their own license terms and fees.
Handoff includes access, operating instructions, failure recovery, and a named system owner. Continued Hiatt Co support is optional.
No second use case until the first is accepted.
Representative client data enters the process in week one.
Agree on one baseline, one target, and one measurement method.
A successful demo is not a successful implementation.
Increase autonomy only when measured performance supports it.
Use client accounts where practical and hand over the project assets.
Use automation to reduce implementation work and cost.
Ask for focused validation and decisions.
Use evaluations and business metrics to decide what improved.
If the economics, data, or reliability do not justify more work, say so.
Accept the first slice before adding more use cases. Each next step has its own scope and written quote.
PRODUCTION EXPANSION
Add integrations, users, edge cases, availability, security, or further workflows when the first result supports it.
OPTIONAL AI OPERATIONS
Month-to-month support can cover monitoring, evaluations, model changes, cost reviews, security updates, and incident support. We agree on coverage and response expectations in writing.
Choose what to handle yourself, what to give an assistant, and what is worth building into a system. A private workshop can capture those choices in an AI Opportunity Map.
Start with what repeats, what gets missed, where people move information manually, and what has a clear measure of good versus bad. Then qualify one workflow.
Download the Opportunity Map templateStart with one process that keeps pulling them away. Tell us what happens today and what a better workday would look like.
Start with a scope conversation. Share a process description, not confidential records.